NOVEDGE blog

ZBrush is Talking; modo, Maya, and CINEMA 4D are Listening!

DCC companies do their best to ensure that 3D models can easily and smoothly be transferred to/from their competitors' systems

Coming from a mechanical CAD background I'm always pleasantly surprised by the open approach in data-exchange of 3D graphics software, more specifically known as DCC (Digital Content Creation). While CAD companies try every trick in the book to make transferring geometric data from one CAD system to the other as difficult and painful as possible, many DCC companies do exactly the opposite: they do their best to ensure that your 3D models, renderings, and animations can easily and smoothly be transferred to and from their competitors' systems.

CAD companies try every trick in the book to make transferring geometric data as difficult and painful as possible

The main reason for this open attitude comes from the typical production process: most of the projects in this field require the use of several software tools and it would be unacceptable not to be able to transfer data back and forth. A second reason is the relative simplicity of DCC data when compared to CAD data. CAD projects represent products someone has to build, therefore they must be extremely precise, and able to host a lot of non-geometric information. On the other hand, many 3D graphics projects have as final goal the creation of a movie or a set of images. Precision has to be good enough to support the required quality for the final video or image, but not more.

Pixologic and Luxology today announced the release of GoZ for modo

A good example of the open attitude of the 3D world can be observed in ZBrush products. Pixologic and Luxology today announced the release of GoZ for modo, a free plug-in for ZBrush that automatically transfers mesh geometry and normal, displacement, and texture maps into modo and back again.

Gamasutra explains the power of the new ZBrush plugins with this example: "With GoZ, modo can be used to create a base model, such as a human head, to provide the basic anatomy. This model can then be instantly transferred to ZBrush via GoZ for brush-based addition of scars, warts and wrinkles. The enhanced model can then be passed back to modo to create the final rendered output files."

This is just the latest in a very interesting series of "connectors," including GoZ for Maya, and GoZ for CINEMA 4D. According to the Pixologic website more connectors are expected to be released soon, which will make life even easier for ZBrush users.

Personally I love to see the artificial barriers between software systems fall. I believe that the entire 3D market will benefit from this open approach and I can't even imagine how much better life would be for CAD users if CAD companies were willing to follow the example of Pixologic.

Franco Folini

Pixologic Videos
[Watch in Full Resolution]
 

[Watch in Full Resolution] Pixologic products are available from Novedge

modo 401 Pushes the Limits of Rendering and Animation

modo has been improved in so many ways that is almost impossible to list everything here

On June 23 Luxology released the latest version of its 3D modeling, rendering, and animation product: modo 401. The version 4 of modo arrived about a year and a half after the release of version 3. modo has been improved in so many ways that is almost impossible to list everything here. Luxology prepared an impressive 14 page guide to the new features of modo 401 with tons of videos and amazing pictures. Among the several new and improved features: better motion blur, stereoscopic rendering, shadow catcher shader, selective radiosity type, volumetric lighting, lights linking, anisotropy mapping, and blurry refractions. The visual quality of the results of modo is very impressive and should rapidly convince everyone about the caliber of the software, as well as of the technical skills and determination of the development team (for more detailed information you can read my interview with Luxology CEO Brad Peebler). modo's rendering is so good that major CAD companies like SolidWorks have licensed the technology from Luxology to offer it to their customers.

SolidWorks licensed Luxology's rendering technology from

My recommendation is to take the time to go through the Luxology pages, learn about modo, and watch out for the upcoming trial version. As soon as the demo version of modo 401 is available we will add it to our website for all the visitors. Don't forget to take a look at Marc Hermitte review of modo written for "It's Art" online magazine and website.

Franco Folini

Adding Details with Replicators Luxology products are available from Novedge

An Interview with Brad Peebler, CEO of Luxology (modo)

Brad Peebler is the CEO of Luxology, the company that makes modo. Luxology modo is based on a technology called polygon/surface subdivision that is changes the way 3D artists and designers create shapes and frees their creativity. Some of the ideas and technologies powering Luxology modo will have a significant impact behind the DCC (Digital Content Creation) area. I'm referring especially to clumsy surface modelers where the mathematical model can become an obstacle for the user's creativity. To get an expert opinion on this and several other topics, I asked Brad a few questions. Here is the interview.

Brad, can you tell us a bit about yourself and your company?

we wanted to create software that offered a new level of speed and control to designers and artists

Yes, Luxology was formed almost exactly five years ago by three people, namely Allen Hastings, Stuart Ferguson and me. Our dream was to write from scratch a new 3D software that leveraged everything we knew from our history with Lightwave 3D and from our own long history of producing 3D content for commercial and personal projects. We wanted to create software that offered a new level of speed and control to designers and artists of all kinds. And we wanted to take full advantage of modern hardware – GPUs and multi-core CPUs for example – that simply did not exist in today’s form back when other software products like Rhino or 3ds Max were architected.

A few key people in your company were previously involved with LightWave. Considering this relationship with NewTek, what makes modo different from LightWave from the end user point of view?

Indeed, the founders all came from NewTek, and we are a very experienced team. However, when we built up our team we went out and found talent from many other places. We have people who worked in film, people who were creating various 3rd party applications and people from the gaming market for example. We even hired Bob Bennett who used to be the General Manager of Maya for Alias. We wanted many different perspectives internally. The goal was to create a software product that had a plastic – and even fluid user interface – which the designer could mold as he or she accomplished different tasks. A user interface that is as malleable as the content being created in the product if you will. The idea being that if we really focused on workflow artists would be able to create more compelling (and just more) content. We nailed that.
And we wanted to create a pragmatic tool, not a theoretical tool. We wanted to build a tool that simply works as expected and let you model anything you want, not just a certain class of objects. Double click on an edge loop in modo and the entire loop is selected. Type in 4*2mm in a units field and the software knows you want 8mm. Simple stuff really. But to make things “just work” means that a lot of that has to go into the software beyond “making it work”.
So we have spent a huge amount of time on making the software operate as fluidly as possible from a designer’s standpoint. You can literally mold the user interface to exactly what you need at any given time. An interesting benefit to this is that we can “harvest” these configs from willing “early adopters” to help us continually provide the most effective, efficient workflow in our defaults for those artists who just want to open the app and get moving.

modo is based on a powerful polygon/surface subdivision modeler. Can you explain what are the benefits for the user compared to traditional modelers?

modo is a tool that lets people create high quality models with a minimum of fuss

We think modo offers a unique combination of tools that really encourages a designer to experiment and come up with interesting alternatives. modo leverages several other technologies like rendering and painting to provide a richer result. Basically, modo is a tool that lets people create high quality models with a minimum of fuss. modo 101 was the first version we shipped – it was a tight and focused modeler that sprang to life on the screen moments after you double clicked the icon. In May of 2006 we shipped modo 201 which was a huge new release of modo. The amount of functionality that was added to modo in that new release was amazing. modo suddenly grew into an application that provides modeling, painting and rendering in a wonderful combination. modo 201 was followed by two updates (202 and recently 203). The modo 203 (March 2007) added new UV editing tools, faster rendering and a new DXF import/export capability to modo, and it is free to existing customers. Now we are previewing modo 301. modo 301 continues our focus on modeling and workflow but also network rendering, basic animation and sculpting to the product.

modo is offering a powerful and yet friendly user interface. Based on your experience, is there any reason the user interface has been a neglected feature in so many other 3D software systems?

a lot of 3D software is a just a big bag of features

For many many years, the focus of software developers has been on getting stuff to work. 3D is hard stuff to code! Much of what you see in today’s tools is a result of pure research and development efforts. That is advancing the underlying technologies and algorithms of rendering, subdivision surfaces and so forth. There simply was not as much attention on how the software felt to use as a designer. A lot of 3D software – even today – is a just a big bag of features. We think modo is more than that. It is software that is enjoyable to use and rewards you for your time. We constantly hear from users that they actually want to spend time in modo.

Some of the technologies you developed for modo -- such as the polygon/surface subdivision -- appear to have a larger potential than DCC (Digital Content Creation). Do you expect to see those technologies being adopted by the more traditional CAD systems?

subdivision surfaces are now getting a lot of attention in the design world. Even CATIA offers a SubD modeler now!

Absolutely, after years of use in the DCC space, subdivision surfaces are now getting a lot of attention in the design world. Even CATIA offers a SubD modeler now! We have a number of high profile users of modo in consumer product design and automotive that are seeing the advantages in having a modeler that can quickly create such a wide range of shapes with a minimum of fuss. A little story: we created a tutorial on how to build a sports shoe a few months back. That one model has resulted in huge attention from the design community. A typical response we hear is “we did not know that Subdivision surfaces could produce a model of that quality.” And when they find out how easy modo is to get results from, that really gets the interest up even further.
Subdivision surfaces have actually been around for a really long time. I believe Symbolics was the first to implement them in a commercial product in the late 1980s! Stuart Ferguson made his first SDS implementation in LightWave3D back in the early 1990’s in a tool called “metaform”. Stuart was somewhat a pioneer in that way. Many people did not see the value in SDS at the time as they thought it merely “smoothed” the model in an undesirable manner. It really wasn’t until Pixar began waving the SDS flag that people starting taking this method of modeling seriously over NURBS. Of course, Pixar President Ed Catmull is the father of Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces.

modo is a new product in a market crowded with several competing systems. In which vertical area does modo excel over its competitors?

our fastest growing markets are 3D package design, architectural visualization and industrial design

Well, we always come back to the superior experience of using modo. We have people tell us that they look for projects to use modo on because it is nice to use. A lot of people use modo at home for personal projects too. We get email from people who are introducing their kids to 3D with modo. Delivering a superior user experience, in turn, requires attention to a lot of details. Object and component selection has to be just right. Navigation needs to have the right feel. We are always trying to make modo work just as you would expect it to. I think that is the main advantage. This means that any business that needs to quickly create a range of alternative designs will benefit from modo. Our fastest growing markets are 3D package design, architectural visualization and industrial design.
From a technical standpoint, we feel our tight integration of the core disciplines sets us apart as well. For instance, being able to have your rendering update as you model or as you paint your mesh is really unique and a huge time saver. There I am back to workflow. You can see how even our hardcore technical implementations (crazy fast, interactive rendering for example) are also about workflow.

modo has a very active and enthusiastic community of users. How does the community of users and their feedback impact the development of the product?

every single Friday we deliver a couple of videos that explain where the software is headed. And then we get detailed feedback on what modo users think about that

I almost answered your previous question with a response about our community -- as it is so central to the experience of using modo. If you have a question on how to accomplish something, you can go to the modo forum on our website and get many helpful responses in an hour or two. And that is where we have an ongoing dialog with the community about the development of modo. Right now, for example, we are previewing modo 301. Every single Friday we deliver a couple of videos that explain where the software is headed. And then we get detailed feedback on what modo users think about that. This directly influences how modo is developed. We even ask modo users about business policies – network rendering policies, how the website should be structured, how we should price training. All of these topics and more are openly discussed with our customers on our Forum.

The internet started as a plain text medium that gradually evolved to include HTML, then images, pictures, and videos. Now, with systems like SecondLife, we are witnessing the Internet becoming a full virtual 3D world. Do you see Luxology having a significant role in this coming revolution?

we are part of a large community of designers and artists who are among the best modelers in the world

modo is already used pretty heavily for game development and is able to produce characters, props and environments that are very efficient for real-time rendering. Of course, our high-speed, photo-quality rendering engine doubles as an incredibly powerful texture baking system for real-time. I think the biggest impact we will have on this new era is that we are part of a large community of designers and artists who are among the best modelers in the world. Exactly how this will pan out is not clear but the large talent pool of modo users will surely have its impact. There is a modo community project underway right now to model as many of the aircraft in the San Diego Air & Space Museum as possible prior to having our modo user event there on August 5th. Over 50% of the aircraft in the museum are now being modeled in modo. That gives you an idea of how strong the talent base is. These are the same people who will shape what the Internet evolves into. And they know 3D!

I would like to thank Brad Peebler for sharing his thoughts with me today.  I would also like to thank Bob Bennett and Immanuel Martin for arranging the interview for me.  If you have any questions for Brad or for Novedge, please leave a comment below and we will be glad to answer.

Franco Folini

An Interview with Dan Ablan, 3D Guru and Writer

Daniel Ablan is a well known 3D computer graphics expert and writer. He is the author of several books about Newtek LightWave, Luxology Modo, and digital photography and cinematography. Dan heads two businesses: AGA Digital Studios, a professional services and training company, and 3DGarage.com, which produces and sells training DVDs. Knowing Dan through Novedge, I couldn't resist asking him a few questions about his professional activities and the future of 3D computer graphics. Here is the interview.

Daniel can you tell us a bit about yourself and your professional activities?

I've been working in the creative arts since the late 1980's

I've been working in the creative arts since college in the late 1980's. I originally started out as a photojournalism major, but ended up minoring in that and majoring in broadcast journalism. In 1989, I was introduced to a Video Toaster from NewTek, and LightWave 3D. I loved it. I began emerging myself into 3D and in 1994, began working full time for myself. It's now 14 years later, and AGA Digital Studios, Inc. creates 3D animations for major corporate and industrial clients. We've also branched off into a comprehensive training division, 3D Garage.com, in 2003. 2007 and beyond will see more 3D animations and even more 3D Garage training videos.

You have been in the 3D computer graphics and DCC (Digital Content Creation) since the Amiga time. In all those years what was the most unexpected evolution that you would never have envisioned? On the other hand, what aspect of technology didn't reach the level of your expectations?

today, you can render entire animations in 10 minutes on computers that cost less than $1,000

I think overall, the progression of technology has been surprising. It wasn't too long ago that burning your own CDs was extremely costly and problematic. Today, anyone can buy a computer, burn their own CDs as well as DVDs. Beyond that, the advancement of OpenGL technology has been amazing, alongside the speed and power increases of the desktop computer.
In my first few years of 3D, rendering a full broadcast resolution frame with just hard shadows, no reflections, refraction or complex bump maps took 10 minutes a frame or more. Today, you can render entire animations in 10 minutes on computers that cost less than $1000. I'm surprised that real time rendering has not become more available however. It seems that as fast as computing technology progresses, software makers find more advanced techniques to test the boundaries of our systems.

The continuous increase of power available on our desktop computers is making possible new approaches to rendering based on the simulation of light (e.g. Maxwell Render and fryrender). What do you think of these new tools? Do you believe that the quality of results justifies the time required to generate a single image?

I'd have to say yes. Think about it - could we even consider rendering a full animation with global illumination just a few years ago? The realism we can achieve with a little extra time is astounding. I'm all for it.

Every day, people excited about some beautiful rendering image come to Novedge asking for the best software tool for modeling and rendering. How would you recommend selecting a 3D system for someone that is approaching it for the first time?

the simplest, cheapest processor is more than fine for anyone starting out in 3D. The key is RAM

People over due it with processors. The simplest, cheapest processor is more than fine for anyone starting out in 3D. The key is RAM. Most people never put enough RAM into their system, opting to "upgrade later" and sell out to the salesman pitching the latest from Intel or AMD. I've always told people to get a decent system with as much memory as they can afford, 2Gigs, 4Gigs, or more better 16Gigs! From there, the video card is crucial. The advent of PC gaming in the 1990's has helped all 3D animators by bringing cheaper and faster video cards to the market. That of course has bled over to Mac as well. Just about any ATI or nVidia 256 MB card will be more than fine for someone starting out in 3D - and beyond.

Can you tell how you collect and organize all the material for a new book or a new training video?

Generally, it's in my head. I start the project and take notes along the way. Lately however, with so much going on, I tend to make lists. I've got a note taking program I use on my MacBook Pro where I keep ideas, project lists, and so on for new training videos and book content.

Many of the technologies powering today's DCC systems are considered mature. In what areas can and should those technologies improve in order to fully empower the end-user?

Well, like anything technology related, I guess it would come down to: faster, better, cheaper!

You produced training material in the form of books and videos. Are you working on any new training? When do you recommend a book and when video training?

Books vs. Videos: that's really up to the user on how they like to learn

Yes. There's lots in the works. I have a few major animation projects going on right now, so I can't add to the training library until July. Books vs. Videos - that's really up to the user on how they like to learn. I like books because I can get away from the computer, read up on the software, then go try it out. Also, videos are often just a demo of the software. Many people "know" their software, they just can't teach it. A book usually has multiple editors who scrutinize over content, flow, and so on. Both are good mediums, and each has their place.

Do you think that new technologies like the one used by Luxology Modo (Polygon/Subdivision Surface Modeler) could ever replace the more "traditional" geometric modeling used by all mechanical design tools?

Replace? Who knows. But, if you take a look at the CAD programs of today, they're not adding more design tools, as much as they are more ways to light and render. That's the next step for anyone building 3D models - so it would make sense that companies employ Luxology's modo and it's excellent render engine to generate imagery. Time will tell!

I would like to thank Dan Ablan for speaking with me today. If you have any questions for Dan or for Novedge, please leave a comment below and we will be glad to answer.

Franco Folini