NOVEDGE blog

Who is Using Wikipedia to Promote Autodesk Inventor?

A few days ago while browsing Wikipedia searching for information I landed on the Autodesk Inventor page.

not exactly an encyclopedic and objective style

Going through the text I was surprised when I found a series of statements that looked as though they have been written by a marketing department. I don't think people at Autodesk (ADSK) are approaching Wikipedia the way Microsoft did (paying a blogger to edit a page). An Inventor fan must have done the editing. When I discovered the page, there were a few statements like:

… Inventor is based on newer, more advanced parametric modeling techniques... Inventor takes these concepts to the next level …

Well, not exactly an encyclopedic and objective style, I would say. And again:

Generally considered a latecomer to the market, Inventor has been developed using a newer technology-base to allow for unique innovations.

What is acceptable for a product brochure is not obviously good for an encyclopedia.

After the discovery, as a Wikipedia member, I cleaned up the page and removed the boldest marketing statements. Thanks to the Wikipedia revision history system, you still can see the original version of the page.

Also, using information from Wikipedia I was able to trace back to the anonymous author of the marketing statements. On February 16, 2007 the mysterious author edited the Inventor page from a computer in Brunswick or Cleveland, OH. Interestingly enough, this is the only contribution of that user to Wikipedia.

Franco Folini

Adobe, CAD, Blogs, and Marketing

The term blogosphere started as a joke but quickly became a common word to indicate the community and the social network of blogs and bloggers. Like every other community, the blogosphere has its own style, guidelines, and customs. These rules are a way for the blogger community to recognize its own members and to define itself. Bloggers define a blog as a group of web pages with certain features, like posts, permalinks, trace-backs, comments, and the presence of the author and date associated with each post. While everybody has the absolute freedom to use the word blog for any web page, the guidelines are shared by almost all the bloggers. For example, I can drive a Smart car and wear a French beret and claim to be a cowboy; but if I sit in a Texas bar, I'm sure the other cowboys would not recognize me as one of them. The same holds true for bloggers and their blogs. If a blog doesn't accept comments and trace-backs we can still call it a blog, but the blogosphere may not consider it one of their own. (FYI: I am not a cowboy and I do not wear French berets. I also do not drive a Smart car.)

According to several experts, the blogosphere style-guidelines are not only useful to the blogger community; they are fully compatible with business and business blogs. The popular book "Blog and Marketing" by Jeremy Wright (blog) presents several examples of companies that are able to benefit from blogs without ignoring or reinterpreting the concept of a blog. In his book Jeremy describes the famous example of Kryptonite. In 2004 the company decided not to address several bloggers' negative feedback about one of its bike locks (see the original video on how to use a 10-cent ballpoint pen to pick a $100 bike lock), and lost a great amount of user confidence in their products.

I'm having a similar experience with a company with plenty of ambitions to enter the CAD world. In a recent post on this blog I highlighted that Adobe Acrobat Reader could benefit from some major redesign and that the latest releases are unstable and can easily crash (mostly when used inside a web browser). A few days later, Doug Halliday on an Adobe official blog acknowledged my post (no links, just my name): "Reader not working? Wow! The point about the reader working or not is interesting. We will investigate this and report back - this is the first I have heard of such issues with the Reader."

In the mean time I found that FoxIt is selling a PDF reader plug-in for the FireFox web browser. The interesting part is how FoxIt is promoting his PDF Reader on LifeHacker website: "You don't need Adobe Reader to load up for 5 minutes, freezing your computer 4 times in the process, just to view a PDF."

I thought it would be useful for Adobe to receive this kind of feedback; I went back to Dough Halliday blog and posted a comment (only after going though an unnecessary registration process): "Hi Doug, Just a short comment on the topic "Reader not Working?" raised by my recent post on NOVEDGE blog and addressed by your post. I believe I'm not the only one experiencing a problem with the Acrobat Reader. It seems to be a known issue. I'm a bit surprised that Adobe has to learn this from me. For example, take a look at the description of FoxIt Reader, a FireFox plug-in intended to replace Acrobat Reader."

My comment was never approved by Dough and never appeared online (blog comments have to be approved in order to be published). Like Kryptonite, Adobe decided to ignore a user feedback.

a blog is a great opportunity for a business to establish a beneficial dialogue with its customers

I sincerely believe a blog is a great opportunity for a business to establish a beneficial dialogue with its customers. Being in a dialogue means to listen and to answer, even when you don't like what your customers are saying. Is Adobe having a dialogue with its customers or just using blogs as a marketing tool? Please feel free to express your opinion by leaving a message (I promise I will not delete your comment).

Franco Folini

P.S. On April 1st, 2007 after leaving a comment, and exchanging a couple of e-mails with me, Doug Halliday published my original comment (dated March 7) on his blog. I would like to thank Doug for his positive reaction to this post.