Visit Novedge

About Novedge

  • Novedge is the leading online store for design software. Visit our website for unparalleled search, comparison charts, and licensing information for over 8,000 titles at competitive prices.

Interviews

« An Interview with Victor Gonzalez, CEO of Next Limit Technologies (Maxwell Render) | Main | An Interview with Greg Milliken, CEO of Alibre »

April 13, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bbe269e200d834525bd569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference An Interview with Doug Halliday, Business Development Manager at Adobe (Acrobat 3D):

Comments

Doug Halliday

Hi Sebastian and Kevin,

Let me try to answer your questions:
Adobe supports COLLADA via Photoshop Extended. It is the format for Google Earth. We don't see COLLADA as a manufacturing standard.

As far as the architecture is concerned, the concept of walk can be organized via Javascripts. As an example, you might go look at the Bentley Systems site to see some examples. We also have the walk tool in A3D. It fixes the camera in one point so it is somewhat limited. I hope this helps.

Kevin Matthews

Franco, nice interview, and thanks for asking this really pertinent question:

"Different categories of users interact with 3D models in different ways. For example, when a user needs to look at the back of a 3D model, a mechanical designer rotates the 3D object while an architect moves around the object."

We've encountered this precise issue in our initial use of 3D PDF in architectural publishing.

I'd love to see it addressed in the standard format. I'm not quite clear on what Doug was saying his answer, on this specific issue of handling the two different viewing paradigms for the different application domains.

Sebastian

Hi,

thanks for the in depth interview and the really interesting outlook! I've two questions, first regarding TTF: does Adobe still support the API TTF was providing for conversion? And second: Acrobat3D still lacks support for COLLADA, which is getting stronger every day, and is going to be supported as an open format not only by the gaming industry any longer.

Regards
-- sebastian

Jim Merry

Hi Antonio,

JT certainly has a lot of great capabilities including storage of precise B-Rep and tessellated geometric information and semantic product manufacturing information (PMI). Acrobat 3D v8 and the new rev PDF (v 1.7) has these same capabilities and adds several as well that are likely to be of interest to the engineering community. These features include (but are not limited to) geometric compression, digital signatures, and encryption. Acrobat 3D provides full support for reading JT files, so anyone with an investment in JT technology can push that information into PDF and gain the compression, encryption and digital certificate/signature capabilities of PDF while leveraging the free Adobe Reader.

There is also an XML channel in the PDF container so any type of structured data can be pushed into PDF files, e.g,. BOM. The APIs for the various PDF viewing clients including the free Reader enable PDF documents to communicate with backend systems like UGS's Teamcenter and send/receive information using XML and SOAP.

This can be very useful when communicating with suppliers who don't or can't have named seats in your PDM/PLM systems.

Antonio Pellizzaro

Hi, I would like to hear some comments on JT. Mostly in the automotive industry, JT is becoming a "de facto" standard when it comes to data exchange. I think that,at this time, JT is more targeted to the engineering world, while PDF is more targeted to the non-engineering world. I would like to hear some comments on the topic.
Thanks,
Antonio

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe by Email